Skip to main content

A never Ending Contradiction

 Things can get weird when we deal with infinity. Consider the following sum:

Grandi

S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 ...


It’s called Grandi’s series, after Italian mathematician, philosopher, and 

priest Guido Grandi (1671-1742).


It is weird but grouping the series in different ways gives different results. 


Let’s look at the first way,


  1. S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 ...

S = (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + (1 ...

S = 0


Here, it is easy to say that the answer is 0 as each individual bracket is equal to 0.


There’s another way of solving this,


  1. S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 ...

S = 1 + (- 1) + 1 + (-1) + 1 + (-1) + 1 + (-1) + 1 …

S = 1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + …

S = 1


Now, we have an answer which is equal to 1.


Again,

What if we subtract 1 from both sides of the equation? it is obvious that it will remain the same. Or will it?

Let’s find out,


  1. S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 ...

1 - S = 1 - ( 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 …)

1 - S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 … 

1 - S = S

2S = 1

S = ½


We’ve got S = ½ 


So, what is the actual answer to this series? Actually, no one knows and it is quite controversial because one can reach towards 2 conclusions,

  • The series 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ... has no sum.

  • The sum is 1/2 .

 

Infact, both of these statements can be made precise and formally proven, but only using well-defined mathematical concepts. 

After the late 17th-century introduction of calculus in Europe, but before the advent of modern rigor, the tension between these answers fueled what has been characterized as an "endless" and "violent" dispute between mathematicians.

 

-Niraaj Ojha (niraaj.ojha@gmail.com)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Woman Behind the First Manned “Journey to the Moon”

  Margaret Hamilton  The Woman Behind the First Manned “Journey to the Moon”   Background  “We choose to go to the Moon''. These words by the then US president John F. Kennedy, addressing the crowd of prestigious Rice University in 1962, was no sort of relief for Americans who feared the overwhelming Soviet Union and the US falling short in what was to be ‘first’ to land man on the moon. Soon after, the courageous and ambitious ‘Journey to the moon’ had its first dedicated mission ‘The Apollo Program’ which despite initially being destined for a trip to Mercury shifted its ambitions a little close to the earth, the lunar surface. The Apollo program, by NASA, was successful in landing the first Manned spacecraft on the Lunar surface just 7 years after its rejuvenation under President John F. Kennedy. The first Lunar module landed the likes of Neil Armstrong, Micheal Collins, and Edwin Aldrin but little do they know the mind behind the software that orchestrated the mo...

Why is any number over 0 undefined or what we say infinity?

  Why is any number over 0 undefined or what we say infinity? We are used to dividing a certain number by another or by the same number since we started learning mathematics. That’s not a big deal. But here’s one big deal that we are always warned about i.e., to divide any number by zero (0).   But Why? Because you get infinity when you do so. But how and why we tend to get so when we divide any number by zero? Let’s have a look at it to better understand!!! ▪          Firstly, what’s multiplication? Nothing but repeated addition. Example: 2×3=6 which means we need to add 2 thrice to get 6.              ▪          And secondly , what’s division? Nothing but repeated subtraction unless we get zero. Example: 15/5=3 which means subtracting 5 thrice from 15 to get 0.   i.e, 15-5-5-5=0 But let’s check in case of 1/0. Accordin...

Mathematics in Crime

Mathematics in crime  Have you ever heard about hit and run case that remained unsolved for a year or longer? That may be because of the fact detective did not use mathematics to solve the case. Wait! What? Mathematics to solve a crime? Yes, mathematics could help a lot in this scenario. Let me elaborate you. Imagine a person hit by a bike and the bike ran away and you are given this hit and run case to be solved. But the only clue you have is the track of the bike on the road spot. What will you do? First, you should think about which direction was the bike coming from during the accident? Suppose these are the tracks of the bike.      Can you find the direction of the bike? Can you tell the size of the bike? Yes we can find both. But the problem you may face is you encounter two tracks overlapped with each other. To know the direction of the bike first you have to find which of the two sets of the tire is the back tire? So here you should use mathematics. ...